[QUOTE who="Jane"]Joe- I would like to know your thoughts about chem-trails...or 
spraying in the sky. Of course people are going to say I'm nuts...but Google 
it...it's real. I live in the country & see them in the morning. They are not jet 
lines...big difference. Any opinions? [/QUOTE]

Much of it is unverifiable which is definitely NOT something I can form a solid 
opinion on, only theorize.  I'm happy to look at information anyone else has on the 
subject.

One Youtube video of a city council meeting in the west reported Aluminum, 
Strontium 90, and Uranium, as collected from rain water samples.  IF it's true, my 
first theory would be that they were employing a corporate solution to pollution, 
dilution for nuclear waste.  There is little difference between Van Wert and Kenton 
in terms of ambient radiation as measured by my own dosimeter (Geiger counter), 
which means if they're doing it, it's difficult to detect.  Often, when there are 
epa violations for waste matter, clean water is injected alongside dirty water to 
meet epa guidelines.  Dispersing radioactive waste into a fine powder would make 
the most sense and would likely lower life cycles.  Current life expectancy in the 
US is 78.8 if memory servers, whereas Monaco is nearly 90. There is one thing we as 
a country are dead last in, and that would be preventable illnesses.  That, by 
itself may well explain the differences and I could easily be wrong about this 
particular theory due to lack of unreliable information.

There has also been discussion about putting Sulfur into the atmosphere, but that 
would likely be extremely counter productive leading to the following:

Energy = Electrical discharges (Lightning)


S + O2 + Energy --> SO2 (Sulfur Dioxide) + H2O --> H2SO3 (Sulphurous Acid)

and...

S + O3 (Ozone) + Energy --> SO3 (Sulfur Trioxide) + H2O --> H2SO4 (Sulphuric Acid)

The counter argument from other scientists to that sulfur proposal was that it 
would likely deplete the Ozone layer.  In theory, they're right and on top of that, 
it would cause acid rain.


Wild theories include references to HAARP and project bluebeam and mind control.  
If anything, and given the apparent incompetency of most governments, I'm more 
likely to think that the trails are actually causing global warming, not preventing 
it.

If I were going to do anything for mind control, I wouldn't attune to some chemical 
in the sky. I'd tune to something common to all humans, which would be 
approximately 2.6 Ghz, the resonant frequency of Fluorine, or perhaps the resonant 
frequency of calcium and at near whisper levels, using amplitude modulation, cause 
sounds to reverberate in the person's head.  Besides, with Tel-lie-vision still 
popular, I'd use that and simply buy out all the media channels, if I wanted to 
control the minds of the people.  People are so justifiably distrustful of 
government at this point, they'll believe any story.  The truth is likely much 
simpler than that.


I'd really love it if someone would firsthand scoop up some of the material 
directly from the trail and report actual findings instead of waiting for it to hit 
land.  When we first started studying the available information, admittedly I was 
absolutely freaked out by it, and we actually followed the trails back to the 
Columbus area.  Between that and verifying that at least for Ohio, the 2 referenced 
fema camps didn't exist, the lesson was to verify sources and to not blindly follow 
any side of any issue.

The lack of transparency alone is enough to warrant suspicion, but fear mongering 
is counter productive.  There has been a persistent effort by the Federal 
government to steal freedom and liberty from the people of America.  That action 
alone is making a good number of people angry to the point of civil war and 
nullification of federal laws.  It would be prudent for each of us to consider our 
wealth as what ability we have to provide services to our community and to ignore, 
as much as possible, monetary systems.